Critical mass agreement vs the Doha Round

Among the advan­tages of a CM agree­ment are sim­plic­ity (it’s much eas­ier to deter­mine the scope of the agree­ment and to fig­ure out what the ben­e­fits will be), and focus (coun­tries join because they can see the ben­e­fit of an agree­ment where—by definition—all the major play­ers will participate).

The con­trast with the labo­ri­ous nego­ti­a­tions required by the WTO’s ‘sin­gle under­tak­ing’ approach could not be sharper. One of the rea­sons that devel­oped coun­try gov­ern­ments have found their own agri­cul­tural lob­bies reluc­tant to pur­sue the cur­rent Doha round ‘modal­i­ties’ is their uncer­tainty about the impact that the 100-page ‘rule book’ will have on their trade oppor­tu­ni­ties. The ‘two track’ trans­parency and nego­ti­a­tions process <a href=“http://www.petergallagher.com.au/index.php/site/article/lets-hope-this-means-more-clarity/” title=“Peter Gal­lagher | Let


No Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email is never shared.Required fields are marked *