Impressions of India

India remains a mys­tery to me. I spent two weeks in south­ern India in Jan­u­ary, in Chen­nai and Ker­ala. It was the first time I had vis­ited any part of the coun­try although, in the past decade I’ve spent some time in all of the states that bor­der India bar Nepal. I expected to find a richer, more hope­ful coun­try with­out the bit­ter war that tore Sri Lanka apart or the end­less inse­cu­rity of Pak­istan or the cor­rupt, indo­lent and mil­i­tarised gov­ern­ment of Bangladesh; a place where a great civil­i­sa­tion was re-emerging.

But I found noth­ing to inspire such hope.

Think­ing back on the trip, it is the super­fi­cial impres­sions that stand out because the sur­face of the place is so… obtru­sive. The lit­ter of dust and paper and plas­tic sweep­ing around every pub­lic space; the lumps of garbage strewn along every street or piled at any gate; the sour smells of decay; the shit of men, cows and dogs on the beaches, on the pave­ments, beside the wall; crum­bling brick, rot­ten wood and con­crete decay; the sooty-smeared stones and stale, dingy clam­our of the tem­ples; greasy-foul water in every chan­nel; roads half-made and more than half-broken.

None of this is unavoid­able or sim­ply an acci­dent of poverty. The neglect looks worse than the casual abuse of the com­mons; it looks more like dis­in­ter­est. I can­not believe that a cul­ture that takes so lit­tle care of pub­lic places will share suf­fi­cient pur­pose to rise far. But per­haps it is dif­fer­ent in the North.

No doubt, my dys­pep­tic view of India was coloured by one of the books I read dur­ing my stay: The Siege of Krish­na­pur by J G Far­rell. The 1973 Booker Prize-winner mocks the res­olute, class-bound jin­go­ism and impe­r­ial pre­ten­sions of the besieged British with great comic effect but finds few redeem­ing qual­i­ties in their Indian assailants, either. It is a book about the lim­its of any civil­i­sa­tion; in the end there is a sort of spare vic­tory for not-very-inspiring char­ac­ter­is­tics — dogged­ness, bloody-mindedness, sur­vival. But even the most sym­pa­thetic Indi­ans (in Farrell’s book) exhibit none of these virtues. Unfair?

2 Comments

  • Plankton wrote:

    I just came across the blog through a lot of blog hop­ping. I am a lawyer and I work in WTO law in India. It always irks every Indian when some­one not from India uses one of the fol­low­ing words to describe what they saw — hope­ful (or on the con­trary, not hope­ful, like you said), colour­ful, vibrant, full of spirit or any­thing in the same mould. Why, we want to say, do they use these words and what does it even mean?

    That’s not the India we know — us urban Indi­ans, for the most part — and any such descrip­tion feels alien to us. I, for one, always feel that most peo­ple in the devel­oped world no mat­ter how edu­cated, form their opin­ion about India through the prism of their developed-ness, their com­fort­able aware­ness of cer­tain com­forts that they take for granted.

    For exam­ple, when I read the com­ment about pub­lic places, my ini­tial thought was that we can­not afford to pay that much atten­tion to our pub­lic places, there isn’t enough money, space or time. My sub­se­quent thoughts did revolve around the indif­fer­ence of the mid­dle class, the wide­spread cor­rup­tion in the sys­tem etc. But even none of those issues are black and white to me, some­one liv­ing in India. So yes, I believe that the vague and some­what unsym­pa­thetic char­ac­ter­i­sa­tion of India offered here by you is unfair because it does not — and can­not — present an accu­rate por­trayal of India.

  • Thank you for your response. I do not sug­gest that my opin­ions of South­ern India are a reli­able or objec­tive view and I cer­tainly agree that it would be unfair to extend them to the whole con­ti­nent (I think I said that).

    I know what you mean by the prism of ‘developed-ness’ and I accept that crit­i­cism. I have spent a lot of time in much less pros­per­ous places than Chen­nai and Ker­ala, how­ever, with­out the same idea aris­ing; that the lack of care for pub­lic spaces sug­gested some­thing about social val­ues rather than just some­thing about poverty. I sup­pose this was because I was dis­ap­pointed in what I saw. I had expected more.

    But India is, of course, indif­fer­ent to my expec­ta­tions and no doubt will sur­prise me again one day.

Leave a Reply

Your email is never shared.Required fields are marked *