Long-term trends

What is sur­pris­ing about this data report­ed in a sto­ry from theBrookings”>http://brook.edu/comm/news/20031001brown.htm”>Brookings Insti­tu­tion? Is it the ‘blip’ or the sub­se­quent decline and steady rate? How is it that sig­nif­i­cant trends—in which we all participated—are some­times so invis­i­ble? bq. “Gill and Schloss­man trace home­work time trends of the past fifty years, find­ing that the only sub­stan­tial increas­es in home­work for high-school stu­dents occurred in the decade after Sput­nik, when the nation launched an aca­d­e­m­ic excel­lence move­ment moti­vat­ed by com­pe­ti­tion with the Sovi­et Union. Home­work time sub­se­quent­ly declined to pre-Sput­nik lev­els, and the excel­lence move­ment of the 1980s and 1990s that fol­lowed the pub­li­ca­tion of “A Nation at Risk” caused sur­pris­ing­ly small increas­es in home­work.”

60 year trend in homework hours, redrawn from a chart in the Brookings story


<

p class=“posted”>[redrawn from the Brook­ings sto­ry]

No Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email is never shared.Required fields are marked *