Obama would have opposed NAFTA, CAFTA and China’s membership of WTO

Now, if we’re hon­est with our­selves, we’ll acknowl­edge that we can’t stop glob­al­iza­tion in its tracks and that open­ing new mar­kets to our goods can help strengthen our econ­omy. But what I refuse to accept is that we have to sign trade deals like the South Korea Agree­ment that are bad for Amer­i­can work­ers. What I oppose — and what I have always opposed — are trade deals that put the inter­ests of multi­na­tional cor­po­ra­tions ahead of the inter­ests of Amer­i­cans work­ers — like NAFTA, and CAFTA, and per­ma­nent nor­mal trade rela­tions with China.”(Remarks to the AFL-CIO)

China even­tu­ally joined WTO because the US Con­gress agreed that the USA, like all other coun­tries, should extend WTO’s ‘most favored nation’ treat­ment (called ‘per­ma­nent nor­mal trade rela­tions’ in the US law) to China. It was the only choice that made sense, then or now, in eco­nomic or for­eign pol­icy terms. It was a mas­sive, direct and imme­di­ate ben­e­fit to US con­sumers (and a win for poor peo­ple in China, too).

But Barack Obama promises that he would not have taken that decision—a promise I find dif­fi­cult to believe—because it was made in ‘the inter­ests of multi­na­tional cor­po­ra­tions’: a propo­si­tion that deserves no credit what­ever.

I found a ref­er­ence to Obama’s speech con­tain­ing this awful idea on Ben Muse’s site: The Cus­toms House.


No Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email is never shared.Required fields are marked *