Richard Baldwin, whose writing I like and whose scholarship I respect, thinks so.
But I disagree for reasons I spell out (after summarizing RB’s argument) in my paper that you can download here
In brief: if we could really do what needs to be done in a WTO 2.0, then we wouldn’t need WTO 2.0 to do it.
Please comment or send me an email if you wish. Especially if you disagree!